No hourly billing. No hidden fees. Choose the package that matches how much credibility groundwork your subject needs — and know your total cost before any work begins.
Every package includes a full eligibility review before we write a word — if your subject doesn't qualify yet, we'll tell you upfront and explain what's missing.
For subjects who already have solid independent media coverage and just need the page written, sourced, and submitted correctly.
7–10 business daysRecommended if additional credibility is needed. We strengthen your source footprint first, then submit from a position of strength.
2–4 weeksA complete digital identity build — Wikipedia page, personal site, biography, media coverage, and search presence, handled end to end.
4–6 weeksAll prices are in USD and quoted per subject. Timelines begin once we receive your background information and approve eligibility. Wikipedia's volunteer review queue can affect final publication dates.
A side-by-side view so you can see exactly where each package starts and stops.
| Feature | Starter $499 |
Authority $1,299 |
Premium $2,999 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eligibility review | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wikipedia research & article drafting | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Citation formatting | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Submission assistance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Authority assessment | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Supporting third-party media placements | — | Up to 2 | Up to 5 |
| Wikipedia optimization before submission | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Personal branding website | — | — | ✓ |
| Professional biography | — | — | ✓ |
| Google Knowledge Panel optimization | — | — | ✓ |
| Social profile optimization | — | — | ✓ |
| Ongoing publication support | — | — | ✓ |
| Typical timeline | 7–10 business days | 2–4 weeks | 4–6 weeks |
The right package depends almost entirely on one thing: how much independent coverage already exists about your subject.
You've already been covered by reputable newspapers, trade publications, or books, and those articles are about you — not just quoting you. The sources exist; the page simply needs to be written and submitted properly.
You have some coverage, but it's thin, dated, or leans on press releases and self-published sources. We assess the gap, help close it with legitimate third-party placements, and only then submit — which is why this is our most-chosen package.
Wikipedia is one part of a broader reputation goal. You want the page, plus the personal site, the biography, the Knowledge Panel, and consistent profiles — so every search result about you tells the same credible story.
Straight answers on what you pay, when you pay it, and what happens if something doesn't go to plan.
The package price is the full price for the scope listed. We don't bill hourly and we don't add charges mid-project. If your subject turns out to need work beyond the package you selected — for example, significantly more source development than Authority covers — we tell you before starting and you decide whether to upgrade. Nothing is ever added to your invoice without your written approval.
Because the most common reason Wikipedia submissions fail isn't bad writing — it's insufficient independent sourcing. Authority includes an assessment of your existing coverage and, where required, up to two supporting third-party media placements to strengthen the citation base before we submit. For subjects whose coverage is borderline, that groundwork is the difference between a page that publishes and one that gets declined.
The eligibility review comes first in every package for exactly this reason. If our specialists determine your subject doesn't yet meet Wikipedia's notability standards, we'll tell you plainly, explain what coverage is missing, and outline what would need to change. We'd rather turn a project down than take payment for a page that will be deleted.
Yes. If a Wikipedia reviewer requests changes or declines a submission, we handle the entire response — reviewing the feedback, strengthening sources or content, and resubmitting — at no additional cost. Our first-attempt approval rate is 98%, but on the occasions where a page needs another pass, that work is already included in what you paid.
You can. If you start with Starter and the eligibility review shows your coverage needs reinforcing, you can move up to Authority and pay only the difference. The same applies to upgrading from Authority to Premium Personal Brand. Nothing you've already paid for is lost.
Yes — Wikipedia pages can be edited by anyone, so long-term monitoring matters. The Premium Personal Brand package includes ongoing publication support. For Starter and Authority clients, ongoing monitoring and maintenance is available as a separate plan; see our Page Monitoring & Maintenance service for details.
Payment is arranged once the eligibility review is complete and you've approved the scope — never before. Your project manager will confirm the agreed package price in writing and send an invoice with accepted payment methods. Timelines start from the point work begins, not from the date of enquiry.
Business and organization pages follow the same three packages, but corporate subjects often require deeper research and a larger citation base. After your eligibility review we'll confirm which package fits and give you a fixed price before any work starts. If your requirements fall outside these packages entirely, we'll quote a custom scope.
Send us your details and our Wikipedia specialists will review your eligibility within 24 hours — then recommend the package that actually fits. No obligation, no pressure.